Assessment Time

For many of us, the colder weather has started to arrive and mid-year assessment is in full swing. Teachers are under the pump to produce mid-year reports and grades. The OpenSTEM® Understanding Our World® program aims to take the pressure off teachers by providing for continuous assessment throughout the term. Not only are teachers continually kept appraised of students’ progress towards meeting the learning goals for the term, they can also provide timeous feedback to students, allowing them to reach those goals more effectively. The Understanding Our World® units are also curriculum aligned, and each curriculum strand is matched through each section of the model answer to the assessment guide, which provides a grading schedule and vocabulary to describe each student’s progress through the core curriculum areas. Thus, teachers need only to collate this information for each student in order to populate the reports.

Students in year levels from Foundation (Kindy/Prep) to Year 3 work through curriculum-aligned sections of work throughout the term and are assessed through a variety of interactions, which include students’ verbal and written responses, as well as drawings and craft projects completed as part of the term work. Students in Years 4 to 6 usually have one main project or summative assessment piece for the term. However, the student workbook provided with each unit is structured to step students through the formative process of completing this work over several weeks, allowing teachers to keep track of their progress and provide regular feedback. The assessment guide provided with each unit, guides teachers on how to assess the assessment piece (as well as the rest of the term work, including the student workbook), as well as providing a marking rubric and vocabularies for students’ achievements from A to E.

TestContinuous assessment is widely recognised internationally as promoting “inclusive and equitable quality education”. A UNESCO report from August 2017 describes the advantages of continuous assessment for teachers, students, parents and other “education actors”. It includes statistics on how it has improved student engagement, confidence and performance, whilst improving the teaching-learning process. The impact of the shift to continuous assessment is particularly marked when applied to lower performing schools and students, where performance increases significantly once continuous assessment is used. Studies from countries in Africa, including Zambia, have shown that students’ performance and engagement were greatly increased after continuous assessment was introduced.  On a global scale, continuous assessment has been shown to improve outcomes for students, parents, teachers and education systems as a whole, especially in the vital area of fostering critical 21st Century competencies. Continuous assessment has been shown to “improve overall quality and equity in education delivery and outcomes”. Feedback – from teachers to students, from students to each other, from teachers to parents and also within the education system itself, is a critical component of this success.

The authors of the UNESCO report warn that “high-stakes, large-scale, annual and multi-annual instruments” of assessment “threatens education” and “continues to favour information over knowledge, and mechanical skill over practical application”. Continuous assessment is also in line with the suggestions in the Gonski 2.0 report. It is perhaps apposite to mention that the Queensland government is currently undertaking a review of NAPLAN and is looking for survey responses. Click on the link provided to take part.

Be Gonski Ready!

Teacher with classGonski is in the news again with the release of the Gonski 2.0 report. This is most likely to impact on schools and teachers in a range of ways from funding to curriculum. Here at OpenSTEM we can help you to be ahead of the game by using our materials, which are already Gonski-ready!

TestThe latest review of “Educational Excellence in Australian Schools” (known colloquially as “Gonski 2.0”) by a panel chaired by Mr David Gonski AC is now available and once again the media has jumped onto the decline of Australian student outcomes and the description of the educational system as “industrial” and out-of-date. The report also mentions “multiple calls on the time of teachers” and “assessment regimes… focused on periodic judgements of performance, rather than continuous diagnosis of a student’s learning needs and progress” (Gonski et al. 2018:ix). The report highlights three core priority areas with five specific recommendations. The first of these recommendations is:

  • “Embed a focus on individual student achievement through continuous learning progress…”

This emphasis on tracking “continuous learning progress” is repeated in recommendation #4:

  • “Introduce new reporting arrangements with a focus on both learning attainment and learning gain…”

(in order to track learning gain, we need to provide continuous assessment). This change has been highlighted in the media – suggesting a move away from periodic exams to a system of continuous assessment.

Here at OpenSTEM, we have long known that continuous assessment is a better route, especially in the primary years. Continuous assessment allows teachers to track their students’ progress and understanding and identify areas of concern quickly and effectively. Continuous assessment means that students are working more effectively towards their learning outcomes, teachers are aware of each student’s progress towards those outcomes and thus time is more efficiently used by all parties. Teachers can provide the timely feedback advocated in the Gonski recommendation #10. Teachers are also spared the giant load of marking a whole class’ worth of assessment pieces in a few days at the end of term, in time for reporting. A few minutes each week spent checking each student’s work means that by the end of term both teacher and student are aware of how the student is tracking and their grade for that term.

The OpenSTEM® Understanding Our World® program for HASS + Science has always provided for continuous assessment for all curriculum items for years Foundation/Kindy/Prep to Year 6 for all HASS and Science subjects. By using this program for these subjects, teachers and students will reap the benefits of continuous assessment. This program also directly addresses recommendation #7:

  • class“Strengthen the development of the general capabilities, and raise their status within curriculum delivery, by using learning progressions to support clear and structured approaches to their teaching, assessment, reporting and integration with learning areas”

These issues are at the heart of the Understanding Our World® program: all of our units contain all of the general capability skills for each curriculum area; progression is maintained through a series of linked units that build upon earlier work; and integration is fundamental. Our Teacher Handbooks and Assessment Guides provide clear and structured information to teachers to guide them through teaching, assessment, reporting, and, of course, integration.

So be Gonski-ready! Use the OpenSTEM® Understanding Our World® program for HASS + Science now and be future-proof in your classroom and school!